Case details

Court: ca9
Docket #: 13-55871
Case Name: Ingenuity13 LLC v. John Doe
PACER case #: 13-55871
Date filed: 2013-05-20
Date terminated: 2013-11-18
Nature of Suit: 3820 Copyright

Documents

Date Filed Document # Attachment # Short Description Long Description Upload date SHA1 hash
2013-05-20 1 0 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF APPELLANT IN PRO SE AND COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 06/19/2013. Transcript due 09/17/2013. Appellant Brett L. Gibbs opening brief due 10/28/2013. Appellee John Doe answering brief due 11/27/2013. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8634950] (BG)
1 1 Main Document 2013-05-20 20:15:31 a4b2ae678b93b6a17491d32ee104d11be2bcde1c
1 2 pro se appls
1 3 Docketing Letter
1 4 Informal Brief Notice
2013-05-20 2 0 Filed representation notice of Brett L. Gibbs Appellant in pro se Served on 05/18/2013. [8634973] (BG) 2013-05-20 18:58:39 81935ef6e19e90b1fdcf69114da125d7c715dd84
2013-07-09 3 0 Filed order (ALEX KOZINSKI, WILLIAM C. CANBY and RICHARD C. TALLMAN) Appellant Prenda Law, Inc.’s June 14, 2013 emergency “motion for order vacating or modifying the district court’s amended order denying in part and granting in part [] Paul Duffy’s motion for approval of bond []; staying nforcement of amended order,” filed in appeal no. 13-55881, is denied. See Azizian v. Federated Dep’t Stores, Inc., 499 F.3d 950, 955 (9th Cir. 2007) (court reviews objections to amount of bond on appeal for abuse of discretion). Appellant Prenda Law, Inc.’s June 14, 2013 request for consolidation, filed in appeal no. 13-55881, is granted. The court sua sponte consolidates the following appeals: 13-55859, 13- 55871, 13-55880, 13-55881, 13-55882, 13-55883, 13-55884, and 13-56028. The following briefing schedule shall govern these consolidated appeals: the consolidated opening brief(s) and excerpts of record are due November 19, 2013; the consolidated answering brief(s) is due December 19, 2013; and the consolidated optional reply brief(s) is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. All parties on a side are encouraged to join in a single brief to the greatest extent practicable. See 9th Cir. R. 28-4. To the extent that appellant Prenda Law, Inc.’s June 14, 2013 emergency motion, filed in appeal no. 13-55881, requests any other relief, such requests are denied. Judge Canby dissents as to the denial of a stay of the condition requiring a second bond in the amount of $135,933.66. Otherwise, Judge Canby concurs in this order. [8696617] [13-55859, 13-55871, 13-55880, 13-55881, 13-55882, 13-55883, 13-55884, 13-56028] (WL)
2013-08-02 4 0 Filed (ECF) Appellant Prenda Law, Inc. in 13-55881 corporate disclosure statement. Date of service: 08/02/2013. [8729170] [13-55881, 13-55859, 13-55871, 13-55880, 13-55882, 13-55883, 13-55884, 13-56028] (PWV)
2013-08-30 5 0 Filed (ECF) Appellant Prenda Law, Inc. in 13-55881 Motion to withdraw as counsel. Date of service: 08/30/2013. [8763791] [13-55881, 13-55859, 13-55871, 13-55880, 13-55882, 13-55883, 13-55884, 13-56028] (PWV)
2013-09-03 6 0 Filed (ECF) Appellant Prenda Law, Inc. in 13-55881 Correspondence: Notice of District Court's Order. Date of service: 09/03/2013. [8766658] [13-55881, 13-55859, 13-55871, 13-55880, 13-55882, 13-55883, 13-55884, 13-56028]--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected filing type and text, resent notice. 09/03/2013 by ASW] (PWV)
2013-09-06 7 0 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LBS): Klinedinst PC’s renewed motion to withdraw as counsel for appellant Prenda Law, Inc. is granted. Court records shall be amended to reflect that Klinedinst PC is no longer counsel of record for appellant Prenda Law, Inc. Within 21 days from the date of this order, appellant Prenda Law, Inc. shall enter appearance of new counsel. Appellant Prenda Law, Inc. is informed that a corporation cannot represent itself. Appellant Prenda Law, Inc. is reminded that a corporation may not proceed in forma pauperis. See Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II, 506 U.S. 194 (1993). Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of appellant Prenda Law, Inc.’s appeal. A copy of this order shall be forwarded to Paul Duffy, sole shareholder of Prenda Law, Inc. at 2 N. La Salle Street, 13th Floor, Chicago, IL 60602. The briefing schedule established on July 9, 2013 remains in effect. [8771236] [13-55859, 13-55871, 13-55880, 13-55881, 13-55882, 13-55883, 13-55884, 13-56028] (WL)
2013-09-25 9 0 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Daniel J. Voelker for - Ingenuity13 LLC and Appellant Prenda Law, Inc. in 13-55881, - Ingenuity13 LLC and Appellant Paul Hansmeier, Esquire in 13-55859, - Ingenuity13 LLC in 13-55871, Appellant Ingenuity13 LLC in 13-55880, - Ingenuity13 LLC and Appellant AF Holdings, LLC in 13-55882, - Ingenuity13 LLC and Appellant Paul Duffy in 13-55883, - Ingenuity13 LLC and Appellant John Steele in 13-55884, - Ingenuity13 LLC, Appellant Prenda Law, Inc. and Appellee Paul Duffy in 13-56028. Date of service: 09/25/2013. [8796477] [13-55881, 13-55859, 13-55871, 13-55880, 13-55882, 13-55883, 13-55884, 13-56028] (DJV)
2013-10-30 11 0 Filed (ECF) Appellant Brett Langdon Gibbs Motion for miscellaneous relief [Notice of Indicative Ruling and Request for Remand and Dismissal]. Date of service: 10/30/2013. [8844732]--[COURT UPDATE: Spread docket text to 13-55884, 13-55883, 13-55882, 13-55881, 13-55859, 13-55880, 13-56028. Resent NDA. 10/31/2013 by RY] (BLG)
2013-11-04 12 0 Filed (ECF) Appellee John Doe in 13-55859, 13-55871, 13-55880, 13-55881, 13-55882, 13-55883, 13-55884, 13-56028 response non-opposing motion (,motion for miscellaneous relief (to be used only if no other relief applies)). Date of service: 11/04/2013. [8849102] [13-55859, 13-55871, 13-55880, 13-55881, 13-55882, 13-55883, 13-55884, 13-56028] (MEP)
2013-11-07 13 0 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): On October 30, 2013, the district court granted appellant’s motion for an indicative ruling. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 12.1. Accordingly, appellant’s request for a limited remand is granted. See Crateo v. Intermark, 536 F.2d 862 (9th Cir. 1976). This appeal is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of enabling the district court to consider appellant’s motion to vacate the May 6, 2013 order imposing sanctions on appellant. Within 60 days after the filing date of this order or within 7 days of the district court’s ruling on appellant’s motion to vacate, whichever occurs first, appellant shall file: (1) a report on the status of the district court proceedings and a motion for appropriate relief or (2) the opening brief. The filing of the opening brief or the failure to file a report will terminate the limited remand. If the opening brief is filed, the answering and optional reply briefs shall be filed in accordance with the time limits set forth in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 31(a). Appellant’s request for dismissal is denied without prejudice to renewal after resolution of this limited remand. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court judge. SM/ (MOATT) [8853936] (WL)
2013-11-14 14 0 Filed (ECF) Appellant Brett Langdon Gibbs Motion for miscellaneous relief [Report of District Court Proceedings Vacating Sanctions and Request to Dismiss]. Date of service: 11/14/2013. [8861511] (BLG)
2013-11-18 15 0 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief and excerpts of record for review. Submitted by - Ingenuity13 LLC and Appellant Paul Hansmeier, Esquire in 13-55859, - Ingenuity13 LLC in 13-55871, Appellant Ingenuity13 LLC in 13-55880, - Ingenuity13 LLC and Appellant Prenda Law, Inc. in 13-55881, - Ingenuity13 LLC and Appellant AF Holdings, LLC in 13-55882, - Ingenuity13 LLC and Appellant Paul Duffy in 13-55883, - Ingenuity13 LLC and Appellant John Steele in 13-55884, - Ingenuity13 LLC, Appellant Prenda Law, Inc. and Appellee Paul Duffy in 13-56028. Date of service: 11/18/2013. [8865603] [13-55859, 13-55871, 13-55880, 13-55881, 13-55882, 13-55883, 13-55884, 13-56028]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected excerpts (4 volumes). Resent NDA. 11/21/2013 by RY] (DJV)
2013-11-18 16 0 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: SM) Appellant’s November 14, 2013 filing in appeal no. 13-55871 is construed as a motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal no. 13-55871 pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). So construed, the motion is granted. Appeal no. 13- 55871 is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court for appeal no. 13-55871. The briefing schedule established on July 9, 2013 remains in effect for the remaining consolidated appeals. [8865660] (WL)